for a repro seems to be fetching good coin........
http://cgi.ebay.com/BUZZ-RICKSON-A-2-HO ... dZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/BUZZ-RICKSON-A-2-HO ... dZViewItem
Roughwear said:It is a rare repro, especially in a size 44 and is based on the 2nd Rough Wear contract. There are three main Ebayers pushing up the price, which is currentky only around $200 less than the new price.
Peter Graham said:Just my opinion but I think it looks dreadful. The colour is way too loud and the leather is as smooth as a baby's bum !
John Lever said:The flash has made it look bad. In natural light it would probably look better.
A-2 ? ...Roughwear said:John Lever said:The flash has made it look bad. In natural light it would probably look better.
Probably true. It's your size John.
John Lever said:A-2 ? ...Roughwear said:John Lever said:The flash has made it look bad. In natural light it would probably look better.
Probably true. It's your size John.
But I like this one -
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... :IT&ih=015
The fact that BR is mentioned is the whole point. It's a badly photographed listing. Check the B-2 auction recently discussed, it went for almost £700.Leadsky said:I just don't uderstand that. Am I in a parallel universe to the guys who were asking questions and bidding on that? Aside from it being poorly presented, it just looks like (to me) featureless, incorrectly coloured rubbish from one of the lower end makers. I'm sure if BR wasn't mentioned anywhere in a blind test very few would pick it.
Leadsky said:I just don't uderstand that. Am I in a parallel universe to the guys who were asking questions and bidding on that? Aside from it being poorly presented, it just looks like (to me) featureless, incorrectly coloured rubbish from one of the lower end makers. I'm sure if BR wasn't mentioned anywhere in a blind test very few would pick it.