TroopCarrier
New Member
Hi all,
aside from the exceptions (which there always are - dependent on unit and/or individual Airmen), below is my non-scientific take on looking at wartime photos of A-2s and B-10s being worn. I am not a novice when it comes to studying wartime photos (although I am a "newbie" on this forum).
Thought it might be a fun different way of looking at the art work.
More common to less:
A-2s w/o patches or name tags (most common)
A-2s w/name tags, but no patches
A-2s w/patches, but no name tags
A-2s w/patches and name tags (very rare)
B-10s w/o patches or name tags (most common)
B-10s w/name tags, but no patches
B-10s w/patches, but no name tags (very rare)
B-10s w/patches and name tags (I've never seen one that I can recall)
Again, yes there are always the exceptions by unit and Airmen who bling out their jackets, but that is not what I'm looking to know.
Jeff
aside from the exceptions (which there always are - dependent on unit and/or individual Airmen), below is my non-scientific take on looking at wartime photos of A-2s and B-10s being worn. I am not a novice when it comes to studying wartime photos (although I am a "newbie" on this forum).
Thought it might be a fun different way of looking at the art work.
More common to less:
A-2s w/o patches or name tags (most common)
A-2s w/name tags, but no patches
A-2s w/patches, but no name tags
A-2s w/patches and name tags (very rare)
B-10s w/o patches or name tags (most common)
B-10s w/name tags, but no patches
B-10s w/patches, but no name tags (very rare)
B-10s w/patches and name tags (I've never seen one that I can recall)
Again, yes there are always the exceptions by unit and Airmen who bling out their jackets, but that is not what I'm looking to know.
Jeff