-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Modern issue A-2: the new collector item?
- Thread starter WingAndaPrayer
- Start date
Skyhawk
Well-Known Member
The pilots in my USN squadron wore their G-1'S flying. You had to put them under the survival vest though. This was in the late 80's / early 90's. Also the Helo pilots wore them. I think that they are too bulky to wear in an election seat though. I was in a E2 Hawkeye squadron so no ejection seats.
Former.USAF.C130
Member
Well, I was an enlisted crew member on the Douglas C=124 Globemaster II and the Lockheed C-130 Hercules in the 1960's. We flew worldwide, so I was at one time or another in various places in Europe, Africa, South America, and the Far East, and points in between. Sadly, I acquired no knowledge of the A-2 because we didn't have them. We were furnished with the MA-1 nylon jacket; like anything else the US government provides its military personnel, they weren't of superior quality. So, cynically, I am dubious about the quality of current issue USAF A-2s.
As to "authenticity" I doubt many military airmen wear leather A-2s on a flight because unlike in the WWII era, airplanes are heated, and jackets of any type are cumbersome, leather being more so than nylon.
I don't think one has to be an aviator or ex-aviator to wear a flight jacket. I wear one now because I think it makes me look studly. As an ex- trucker, I prefer a sturdy jacket to one that is pretty, because it is going to be up against machinery or other objects which might damage it. I also think a person should spend as much money as he can afford on whatever he wants, including flight jackets. That may be why I haven't got any now. As Willie Nelson says, "I spent my money on whiskey and women, The rest of it I wasted."
I wore my A-2 flying and so did others, just not too often. We never wore them during combat operations tho.
MauldinFan
Well-Known Member
I know a F-15 pilot with the USAF reserve and he's told me he HAS worn his A2 while flying and he has seen several others do the same.
I always laugh at those who declare something current will never be collectible. I knew several people who said the same of Vietnam era stuff and look what people are shelling out these days for that.
You just never know what people are going to get into. For example, WW1 stuff was collectible for a long time but it's value has gone up and down like a roller coaster over the last century.
For that matter, think of the people who "invested" in Beanie Babies to their crushing disappointment after the fad faded.
If any of you could accurately predict values and interest, you should become a broker!
I always laugh at those who declare something current will never be collectible. I knew several people who said the same of Vietnam era stuff and look what people are shelling out these days for that.
You just never know what people are going to get into. For example, WW1 stuff was collectible for a long time but it's value has gone up and down like a roller coaster over the last century.
For that matter, think of the people who "invested" in Beanie Babies to their crushing disappointment after the fad faded.
If any of you could accurately predict values and interest, you should become a broker!
Skyhawk
Well-Known Member
I think it could be done with an A-2. You would have to wear it under the harness and that would keep it compact. The G-1 however I think is too bulky to cinch down enough for ejection seat use. I never saw a jet pilot wear one flying during my time in the USN. Just saw the prop and rotor pilots wearing them. Never say never though...
Former.USAF.C130
Member
"modern issued A-2s aren't flying gear"...Is this true in the USAF?
I know jackets aren't necessary on transport planes or bombers. They are adequately heated. I could see a need for fighter pilots in case they have to bail out or if one was a chopper crew flying with the door open.
Former.USAF.C130
Member
I was thinking about trying to predict future values of what I will call "future vintage" flight jackets. I had in mind what happened with Beanie Babies: if I am not mistaken, the manufacturer just kept churning them out until the market was saturated.
By contrast, I assume that the supply of Vietnam-era flight jackets in decent shape is limited. Leather flight jackets were not in use in the USAF in the 1960s. Everything was nylon, not very attractive, and probably has been beaten to death. But because of limited supply, I would anticipate that Vietnam era gear will grow in value.
As to modern A-2s, assuming the USAF continues to use them, the makers will keep churning them out. I don't foresee the future USAF A-2s being distinctive, much less beautiful, as some WWII jackets were.
Another thing I will comment on: if the value of a jacket is influenced by whether it was used in flight, use in the airplane clearly applied to most WWII jackets, because they were only passed out to fliers and the occasional general, and we know the fliers wore them on missions. Apparently current A's are not flight gear, so they will not have the swashbuckling aura of a WWII jacket. Therefore, I see no reason why current issue USAF A-2s will grow in value, because they are mass-produced with no limit on quantity, aren't beautiful, and have no likely flying history.
If I were inclined to collect, I would be going for flight jackets of various brands and various types of leather in various colors. And, I would wear them.
B-Man2
Well-Known Member
You make a lot of good points. A number of us think that current issue USAF A2 jackets will definitely appreciate over time ….However ,
It won’t be in our lifetime. Remember that WWII A2 jackets could be purchased by the truck loads for $8.00 or $10.00 each in the early 1950s . No one wanted them. It wasn’t until the late 1960s era that wearing one started to become trendy. Of course now you can’t touch a nice conditioned original WWII A2 in a larger sized 44 or 46 for less than $1500 to $2000.
And that’s an optimistic price . Painted A-2s in original condition are easily going for 5 to $6,000 dollars .
Former.USAF.C130
Member
Nickb123
Well-Known Member
Good point about modern A-2s not associated with being worn in the cockpit and thus lacking the allure of their WWII counterparts.
While there are absolutely zero signs modern A-2s will match the popularity of WWII jackets in 100 years from now, I wouldn’t say it’s impossible. I contend that the future remains wide open for modern A-2s to develop collector’s status. I’d say unlikely, but I won’t close that door entirely…think of the paradigm shift with drones gradually replacing manned flight. Perhaps in a hundred years collectors will romanticize about the “pre-AI” age with the same fervor as us with WWII and these newer A-2s will amass collector status We just can’t know.
While there are absolutely zero signs modern A-2s will match the popularity of WWII jackets in 100 years from now, I wouldn’t say it’s impossible. I contend that the future remains wide open for modern A-2s to develop collector’s status. I’d say unlikely, but I won’t close that door entirely…think of the paradigm shift with drones gradually replacing manned flight. Perhaps in a hundred years collectors will romanticize about the “pre-AI” age with the same fervor as us with WWII and these newer A-2s will amass collector status We just can’t know.
Former.USAF.C130
Member
I can't dispute your knowledge or reasoning.
I suppose we would have to know what would be the motivation of future buyers of current issue A-2.
I occasionally read Gentleman's Quarterly and Esquire. More than once, I have seen ads for new "designer" garments that resemble the MA-1 flight jacket or A-2 flight jacket. The prices are staggering--in the thousands. I assume the people who buy this stuff think it is a cool look.
I suppose we would have to know what would be the motivation of future buyers of current issue A-2.
I occasionally read Gentleman's Quarterly and Esquire. More than once, I have seen ads for new "designer" garments that resemble the MA-1 flight jacket or A-2 flight jacket. The prices are staggering--in the thousands. I assume the people who buy this stuff think it is a cool look.
Thomas Koehle
Well-Known Member
How about the sizing? Did you buy your regular size or did you follow the advice from 3 pages earlier to size down?
Any fitpics available?
Thomas Koehle
Well-Known Member
I'm with @MauldinFan - i can see an increase of value on the collectors-market of current issued (or lets say "new generation") A2 and the USN equivalent - no matter whether they have been produced in the 190ies or recently.
Given here on the forum we are a kind of "elite" (yeah sounds great) in terms of recognise "real" pieces from mall-jackets.
Any average person will not be able to distinguish an AVIREX G1 full of phantasy patches from an issued 1968 STAR patched with retraceable nametag and squadron/carrier patches.
Such a person will possibly be part of a collector-community even for the cheapish build "new" A2.
I remember when i was around 15 yrs i volunteered at the German Redcross when we emptied storage rooms full of WW2 steelpots (still with the sawstika-stickers on them) and gasmask and had them thrown in the scrap-metal container ...
Noone ever had expected the value those things have today ...
Given here on the forum we are a kind of "elite" (yeah sounds great) in terms of recognise "real" pieces from mall-jackets.
Any average person will not be able to distinguish an AVIREX G1 full of phantasy patches from an issued 1968 STAR patched with retraceable nametag and squadron/carrier patches.
Such a person will possibly be part of a collector-community even for the cheapish build "new" A2.
I remember when i was around 15 yrs i volunteered at the German Redcross when we emptied storage rooms full of WW2 steelpots (still with the sawstika-stickers on them) and gasmask and had them thrown in the scrap-metal container ...
Noone ever had expected the value those things have today ...
Last edited:
B-Man2
Well-Known Member
A good conversation ….Nick made the point that maybe in 100 years currently issued A2’s might achieve collector status , and yes it might take that long .. but consider this .. Will any original wearable WWII A2’s still be around 100 years from now ? Who knows .. maybe … maybe not … in which case currently issued A2’s may become collectible simply by default … if someone wants an original issued A2 those may be the only option. And one more thing … after 100 years … aren’t most things collectable … by someone ??
Last edited:
Jackets are necessary. Gonna need one under an exposure suit if you bail out or ditch in the Atlantic in winter. It doesn't matter what it's like in the aircraft, it was a "bring along" item.
Former.USAF.C130
Member
If I were inclined to collect, I would be going for good-quality (not top-quality) flight jackets of various types of leather in various colors.
Last edited:
Former.USAF.C130
Member
Re fit: I did not follow the recommendation to size down; I wasn't aware of it. Depending on the brand, I usually wear either a 46R or 48R in a suit or sport coat, but sometimes I have worn a Long. In flight jackets I have worn various sizes over the years, as my weight fluctuates.
I devoted a LOT of time trying to find the right fit for a flight jacket. I already knew that fit depends upon size and manufacturer; one maker's 46 will not necessarily be the same as another maker's 46. . . I have a size 48R G&B which fits perfectly. I have an Old Avirex in Size XL Regular, which I think is in the range of Size 46-48. It fits me perfectly in the chest and arms, but is short. I tried a Cooper 46R and it was tight and restricted my arm movements, so I would probably need a size 48 in a Cooper.
Eventually I ordered a DSPC Cockpit USA in 46 Long, on the basis that it was inexpensive and returnable. [A 46 Regular comes just below my belt, and if my pants slip down, the belt buckle will peek out.] If it didn't fit well, I would go up to a 48.
I am very happy with the fit of the DSCP Cockpit USA 46L.
I will be happy to provide pictures, but I don't have a decent camera. I know somebody who does, but it might take several days to get an appointment with her. So please be patient.
Last edited:
Former.USAF.C130
Member
True.
