• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

“A Better Fighting Garment…” 2.0 - A Revised Guide to the U.S. Navy's Intermediate Leather Flight Jackets

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lord Flashheart

Well-Known Member
Part 2 - After the Second World War - Post WW2, the Korean War, and the 1950s.

6. G-1 (55J14) [1947 - 1950]


Many write-ups on the 55J14 (e.g. Eastman’s) can inadvertently leave readers confused about the relationship of the first G-1 to earlier flight jackets. Since the last Navy jacket prior to the 55J14 that most repro makers offer is the M-422A, novices can be forgiven for supposing that the Navy had just not been producing jackets for several years prior to the introduction of the G-1. In fact, if you look at the contract data from the previous section, the last of the AN-J-3A contracts was issued in the same fiscal year as the first of the G-1 jackets. What’s missing here is some context.

In July the same year that the first G-1 contracts went out, U.S. President Harry Truman signed into law the National Security Act of 1947, which established the Air Force as an independent branch of the United States military. While most people in our hobby are familiar with that date, the changes had far more wide-reaching impacts than just what roundel appeared on Air Force jackets. This Act of Congress established the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the National Security Council (Britannica: National Security Act). More importantly, for our purposes, it also consolidated the Departments of War and the Navy into a new Department of Defense. A key priority here was to streamline the administration of the U.S. Military and “eliminate the duplication of effort in the DoD” (Britannica: National Security Act).

In this light, it’s really not surprising that the AN-J-3A, which was, on paper, joint service equipment for the Army and Navy, but actually a Navy jacket, was re-classified. Whereas for previous jackets, the Navy had treated “drawing number” as the higher-order category and “type” and “specification” as two names for the same thing (e.g. drawing number AN-6552, type/specification AN-J-3), now, under the Department of Defense, “type” seems to become the umbrella category. Hence, the Navy’s jacket was now listed “Type G-1, Specification 55J14.” This new method of bookkeeping was evidently not confined to the Navy, because Air Force flight jacket labels from this period also list a type and specification number.

The 55J14 had six manufacturers: Aviators Clothing Co. (formerly the well-known Air Force contractor, Aero Leather Clothing), L.W. Foster Sportswear, A. Pritzker & Sons, Star Sportswear, Burjac Sportswear (formerly Edmund T. Church Co.), and the (now incredibly rare) B.-G. Inc. (FG 123). Of these, the Aviators Clothing Co. jackets have proven extremely prone to red rot (Sheeley, 27 Sep. '22), and collectors are advised to be careful when buying a jacket of this contract.

A certain number of what appear to be Foster and Star 55J14s have an unusual spec label that reads simply “BUAER - U.S. NAVY G-1 FLIGHT JACKET SPEC. 55J14 (AER)” without any indication of contract number or manufacturer. These jackets also have an unusual, straight-pull Conmar or Talon zipper, instead of the usual bell pull. The Talons can tentatively be dated to the 1950s. As you can see below, Foster and Star both had a contract for the 55J14 in Fiscal Year 1950. It is thus possible (but at this point unverifiable) that these were additional jackets tacked onto Foster N383S-29897 and Star N383Ss-39943, both from Fiscal Year 1950. The fact that the Korean War began that very year provides a plausible reason why the Navy might have needed more jackets.

By contrast, it has also been speculated that these might be early versions of the 55J14 (Chapman CD> 55J14> Foster #3), although the late date of the Talon zippers makes this dubious. We also have doubts about whether there would really have been a need for test jackets, given how much continuity we see in Navy jackets – the 55J14 really does just seem to be the AN-J-3A under a new filing system. Nevertheless, both hypotheses are possible, and we leave it to the readers to make up their own minds, or indeed to remain agnostic.

55J14 jackets have been characterized as shorter than previous specifications, tighter in the gut, and with longer sleeves. This is an accurate description of the Foster contracts, but, Star and B.-G. Inc. had short sleeves, relative to their torsos, and the Aviators Clothing Co. contract is unusually blousy. Given that Foster received just under half of the 55J14 contracts, however, it’s easy to see how the 55J14 got this reputation. There thus aren’t any real consistent trends when it comes to the patterning of the 55J14s, and, as before, it is more productive to look at the differences between individual contractors, rather than different specifications.

The 55J14 nevertheless retains most of the characteristics of earlier intermediate flight jackets, such as the USN stencil under the collar. Most feature a blackened conmar zipper with a bell zipper pull. And as Dave Sheeley notes, it appears that the 55J14s were the last series of jackets to be made of both vegetable- and chromium-tanned goatskin; the last clear use of veg-tanned goatskin (amongst chrome-tanned goatskin) appeared in the 1950 B.-G. Inc. contract. The B.-G. 55J14 is also the last model USN jacket that was constructed using both nylon and cotton thread (https://www.vintageleatherjackets.org/threads/sheeleys-55j14-b-g-inc-g-1.21860/). We therefore follow Sheeley in characterizing the 55J14 as a transitional flight jacket.
 

Lord Flashheart

Well-Known Member
SPECIFICATION 55J14 (AER)Contract dates Identifying Features & comments[Source]/Links
BURJAC SPORTSWEAR INC.CONTRACT No N383s-5299 Probable Fiscal Year 1947Manufacturer formerly known as "Edmund T. Church Co." Contract can be distinguished by white/silver USN stencil; large, gently scalloped pocket flaps; angular top of the windfap; front panels sewn over back; [FG 123; Chapman CD> M-422A> Church #1; Chapman CD> 55J14; Burjac #1]
L.W.FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO. INC. N383S-10427Probable Fiscal Year 1948Line of stitching distinguishing pen pocket (similar to G&F M-422A); small collar; simple throat latch; short torso & long sleeves; back much wider than earlier contractors.[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Foster #2]
L.W.FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO. INC. CONTRACT NO. N383s-13120Probable Fiscal Year 1949Line of stitching distinguishing pen pocket (similar to G&F M-422A); small collar; simple throat latch; short torso & long sleeves; back much wider than earlier contractors.[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Foster #2]
L.W.FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO. INC. CONTRACT NO. N383s-20445Probable Fiscal Year 1949Line of stitching distinguishing pen pocket (similar to G&F M-422A); small collar; simple throat latch; short torso & long sleeves; back much wider than earlier contractors.[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Foster #2]
AVIATORS CLOTHING CO., INC. CONTRACT NO. N-383s-22111 Probable Fiscal Year 1949Manufacturer formerly known as "Aero Leather Clo. Co."

Contract extremely prone to red rot.

Distinguishing features are a wider back than is typical of 55J14s; side seams positioned directly under sleeves; back belt appears very wide; blousier than most Navy jackets.
[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Aviators Clothing Co.]

https://www.vintageleatherjackets.org/threads/sheeleys-aviators-clothing-co-55j15-g-1.27849/

https://www.ebay.com/itm/113782291542
B.-G. INC. CONTRACT NO. 383s-25923Probable Fiscal Year 1950Hanger loop sewn so it doesn’t sit flat on the liner; small back panel relative to front & short sleeves relative to torso length, much like a WW2 Navy jacket.[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> B.-G.; https://www.vintageleatherjackets.o...g-inc-g-1-with-cag-11-patch.24940/post-281908]
L.W.FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO. INC. N383S-29897Probable Fiscal Year 1950Line of stitching distinguishing pen pocket (similar to G&F M-422A); small collar; simple throat latch; short torso & long sleeves; back much wider than earlier contractors.[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Foster #2]
STAR SPORTSWEAR MFG.CO. LYNN, MASS.CONTRACT NO. N383Ss-39943Probable Fiscal Year 1950Short sleeves; broad shoulders; white USN stencil[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Star #1, 2, 3]
STAR SPORTSWEAR MFG.CO. LYNN, MASS. CONTRACT NO. N383s-51863Probable Fiscal Year 1951Short sleeves; broad shoulders; darker leather than previous contract; white USN stencil[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Star #1, 2, 3]
A. PRITZKER & SONS, INC. CONTRACT NO.N383s-69537Probable Fiscal Year 1951Frequently a light green/OD liner; bottom knits proportionally equal between rack and rib weave; leather tanned such that it shows its base color as the leather ages; narrow back with front panels wrapping back to meet the back panel.[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Pritzker #1, 2]
L.W.FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO. INC.CONTRACT NO.N-383s-96273Probable Fiscal Year 1952Line of stitching distinguishing pen pocket (similar to G&F M-422A); small collar; simple throat latch; short torso & long sleeves; back much wider than earlier contractors.[FG 123; Chapman CD> 55J14> Foster #2]
 

mulceber

Moderator
55J14 - Burjac Sportswear N383s-5299
4E93A49E-58C6-4718-A18D-38BC1C88E508_1_105_c.jpeg

446E91C1-CEE6-4CEC-ACF2-5E1570FA7A3E_1_105_c.jpeg

916D9652-4F05-4027-8E94-0DE3AF47FD19_1_105_c.jpeg

879F89A6-5C90-41A0-8077-5DAB543FA18A_1_105_c.jpeg

CB8622D0-1343-43D8-B511-0109FF8AEC16_1_105_c.jpeg

63A917DD-AE8E-4631-BC43-0D7B7D8E0FD8_1_105_c.jpeg

E2517B6A-3012-47FF-8DE5-A9D379F0A413_1_105_c.jpeg

D575FF6F-D6C2-4C76-8C38-B713FF0EFBBE_1_105_c.jpeg

D7834AC5-CBE0-4614-8D9B-CB75DFE46632_1_105_c.jpeg
 
Last edited:

mulceber

Moderator
55J14 - B-G Inc 383s-25923, photos courtesy of @Stony
F1C26BF3-4F28-4963-9F06-FBF67400D443.jpeg

4D52F4F3-7B94-42D5-9AB2-37BD2BB96CA0.jpeg

4E6F3C52-5400-495C-90E1-152A8D31D28C.jpeg

6330A189-778E-4B13-9C97-484EC8D7D50B.jpeg


55J14 - B-G Inc 383s-25923, photos courtesy of John Chapman

600D9A25-EA1C-4693-8361-C3386E7AAE7C.jpeg

AE166F3A-59E1-48B8-AEE7-4A315D795FF7.jpeg

9D67E6D8-BC51-4B31-8F98-158AFDE97F32.jpeg

3055D80F-7828-4209-BB4C-3C9471A906F3.jpeg

097CBA57-C5E3-450F-8232-A0364EB91B7E.jpeg

E28A9CD6-3173-4873-84F3-B2035458FF9C.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Lord Flashheart

Well-Known Member
7. MIL-J-7823 (AER) [1951 - 1960] “....the specifications were defective…”

The 7823 (AER) is the first iteration of its own series of G-1 jackets, with the first contract of 1951 belonging to Monarch Mfg. Co. Despite subtle differences between different manufacturers, the 7823 (AER) series retained most of the 55J14’s hallmarks, such as the no.5 blackened Conmar zipper. Most noticeably, because the 7823 specification ran from 1951 to 1961 (a 10 year span), there were many formal and informal amendments to the specification over time. An example of an informal amendment is most easily demonstrated by the shape of the pocket flaps as between 7823 (AER)s. Imagine a 1951 Monarch Mfg. (N383s-80667), a 1957 Cagleco Sportswear (N383-39321A), and a 1958 L.W. Foster Sportswear (DA-36-243-QM(CTM)2134). Their pocket shapes range from scalloped, to triangular, to rounded (respectively). Minor evolutions like these exist throughout the 7823 (AER) specification. Although perhaps a quirk between manufacturers, it is commonly agreed that pocket flaps (as with many other features) became plainer in design for easier manufacturing as time went on. An example of a formal amendment is demonstrated with L.W. Foster Sportswear’s 7823 (AER) & AMEND #2 of the N383-22356A contract of 1955, where the amendment is clearly stated on the tagging of the jacket. Perhaps another important change of note is the shift from the USN stencil under the collar of jackets to a USN hole stamp on the wind-flap in the mid-late 50s.

An important change with ramifications for how Navy jackets were made came in 1956, when contracting for military garments passed from the Navy to a completely new agency, the Military Clothing and Textile Supply Agency (MCTSA), which served all branches of the military. While bringing under one roof all the contracting for the clothing used by the different branches made a certain amount of sense, the MCTSA lacked the experience and flexibility of the Navy. The approach of the MCTSA became a source of conflict.

The result was L. W. Foster Sportswear Co., Inc. v. the United States, a court decision handed down on January 24, 1969 https://casetext.com/case/lw-foster-sportswear-co-v-united-states-2 concerning two 1958 contracts for about 54,000 jackets.

From 1949 to 1956, L.W. Foster had successfully manufactured approximately 200,000 flying jackets for BuAer under a series of contracts which contained specifications the same as or very similar to the 1958 contracts. L.W. Foster "envisioned no difference" as to what would constitute an acceptable garment under the contracts now being given out by the MCTSA because, although a new procurement agency was involved, the contract was for same jackets which it had previously made for the Navy. At the peak of these contracts the company was delivering nearly 3000 jackets each week although they were delivered late. L.W. Foster sought an adjustment of the contract price to reimburse additional costs which was rejected by MCTSA.

L.W. Foster argued in court that the specification requirements for the type of seams for the joining of the knit to the leather and the rayon lining underneath did not accord with the best practices of the trade, were virtually impossible to perform without causing abrasions and cut leather, which would be scored as defects, and that the operation should be performed by another method. Another problem developed with regard to the method of sewing the pocket flap to the face of the jacket. The company argued that the method prescribed by the specifications was inconsistent with the contract diagram, was "practically impossible" to accomplish and could cause damage to the jacket. On top of this the quality assurance regime revealed scoring as major defects healed scars and healed briar scratches by an Inspector who did not know what these were and with mended knits scored as defects but which did not affect appearance or serviceability. These were not the only issues that led to the lawsuit.

In judgment, the six Judges held “There is no doubt, in the first place, that the specifications were defective. The record clearly reflects instances in which defendant's agents admitted as much. The Government later amended the specifications in question, incorporating many of the changes found necessary in the performance of this contract.” and found that the company knew that it could not produce an acceptable flying jacket under the contract specifications, as written, at the time that it submitted its bid. But it had had five or six previous contracts with the Navy for the same type of jacket, with the same or very similar specifications, and in every case deviations were made and allowed as a matter of course — and had to be made for production to go on. The Judges concluded that the company had acted reasonably in assuming that the formal change from BuAer to MCTSA did not break the working relationship which had already been established.

The circumstances of this lawsuit may well have played a part in the split of Lou and Irvin Foster. Whilst Lou stopped making leather jackets, Irvin nevertheless went on to deliver a number of subsequent 7823 series jackets under Irvin B.Foster & Sons Sportswear Co. We speculate that Irvin may have worked with the Navy to revise the specification and make the design commercially practical. As the government amended the jacket specification after 1960, this would have made the construction more predictable for everyone albeit, from our perspective here, probably less interesting and varied in detailing. From this point forward, the different G-1 contracts become much more uniform in their design and are quite difficult to distinguish without a spec label.
 

Lord Flashheart

Well-Known Member
SPECIFICATION MIL-J-7823(AER)Contract datesIdentifying Features & comments[Source]/Links
L.W.FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO., INC CONTRACT NO.N383s-74471Probable Fiscal Year 1952Line of stitching distinguishing pen pocket (similar to G&F M-422A); small collar; simple throat latch; back much wider than earlier contractors; angled windflap.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Foster #1]
MONARCH MFG. CO. CONTRACT NO. N383s-806671951 / Fiscal Year 1952Seam running down back of liner; wind flap ends 1 inch short of bottom of jacket; white/silver USN stencil; inside pocket built into the leather facings, unlike earlier Monarchs.[FG 125; Sheeley]
WERBER SPORTSWEAR, INC. CONTRACT NO.383S-88886Probable Fiscal Year 1952#1 IDing feature is a Talon zip that was made in Canada and says so. Only Werbers had these. Also scalloped pocket flaps, pockets are placed close to zip, long sleeves & short torso. The leather facings inside the jacket are multi-piece.[FG 125; Chapman CD > 7823 > Werber #2]
A. PRITZKER & SONS, INC.CONTRACT NO. N383S-319AProbable Fiscal Year 1953Rectangular or slightly rounded pocket flaps where earlier Pritzker contracts were scalloped; leather tanned such that it shows its base color as the leather ages; narrow back with front panels wrapping back to meet the back panel.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Pritzker]
J.A.DUBOW SPORTING GOODS CORP. CONTRACT NO. N383S-4765AProbable Fiscal Year 1954Frequently quite dark leather; long body, short sleeves; narrow back with front panels wrapping back to meet the back panel; widely-spaced pockets; white USN stencil.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Dubow]
J.A.DUBOW SPORTING GOODS CORP. CONTRACT NO. N383S-4833AProbable Fiscal Year 1954Frequently quite dark leather; long body, short sleeves; narrow back with front panels wrapping back to meet the back panel; widely-spaced pockets; white USN stencil.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Dubow]
CAGLECO SPORTSWEAR CONTRACT NO N383s-9211A1954Small shoulders; collars are large and splay out when worn; pockets are large and placed close to zip; angular windflap; dark liner; high stitch count; mouton frequently a dark shade; white USN stencil.[Sheeley; FG lists it as Probable Fiscal Year 1954 as well; Chapman CD> 7823> Cagleco #4] https://www.vintageleatherjackets.org/threads/duplicated-fathers-original-g-1-flight-jacket.20658/
CAGLECO SPORTSWEAR CONTRACT NO N383s-14722AProbable Fiscal Year 1954Small shoulders; collars are large and splay out when worn; pockets are large and placed close to zip; angular windflap; dark liner; high stitch count; mouton frequently a dark shade; white USN stencil.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Cagleco #4]
SPECIFICATION MIL-J-7823(AER) & AMEND. #2 L.W. FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO, INC. CONTRACT N383-22356AProbable Fiscal Year 1955Wide back like earlier Fosters; small collar; rounded pocket flaps; perforated USN stencil in windflap; rounded windflap[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Foster #4]
L.W. FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO, INC. CONTRACT N383-22356AProbable Fiscal Year 1956Wide back like earlier Fosters; small collar; rounded pocket flaps; perforated USN stencil in windflap; rounded windflap[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Foster #4]
CAGLECO SPORTSWEAR CONTRACT NO N383-28657AProbable Fiscal Year 1956Small shoulders; collars are large and splay out when worn; pockets are large and placed close to zip; angular windflap; dark liner; high stitch count; mouton frequently a dark shade; white USN stencil.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Cagleco #4]
CAGLECO SPORTSWEAR CONTRACT NO N383-39321AProbable Fiscal Year 1957Small shoulders; collars are large and splay out when worn; pockets are large and placed close to zip; angular windflap; dark liner; high stitch count; mouton frequently a dark shade; white USN stencil.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Cagleco #4; roughwear VLJ]
https://www.vintageleatherjackets.o...cket-mil-j-7823-aer-helantisubron-five.26740/

https://www.vintageleatherjackets.o...ermediate-flight-jacket-mil-j-7823-aer.26351/
CAGLECO SPORTSWEAR N383 48082AProbable Fiscal Year 1957Small shoulders; collars are large and splay out when worn; pockets are large and placed close to zip; angular windflap; dark liner; high stitch count; mouton frequently a dark shade; white USN stencil.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Cagleco #4]
CAGLECO SPORTSWEAR QM(CTM)-144-O.I.-2515-E-57Probable Fiscal Year 1957Small shoulders; collars are large and splay out when worn; pockets are large and placed close to zip; angular windflap; dark liner; high stitch count; mouton frequently a dark shade; white USN stencil.[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Cagleco #4]
L.W.FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO., INC CONTRACT NO. DA-36-243-QM(CTM)2134Contract date four weeks after QM(CTM)2312 1958, delivered in 1959




Delivery at peak of nearly 3000 jackets per week. Chapman estimates a total or 54,000 jackets.

Subject of a lawsuit between manufacturer and government.

Wide back like earlier Fosters; small collar; rounded pocket flaps; perforated USN stencil in windflap; rounded windflap
[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Foster #4; See L. W. Foster Sportswear Co., Inc. v. the United States. January 24, 1969]

https://www.vintageleatherjackets.o...e-flight-jacket-mil-j-7823-aer-vma-223.27125/

https://www.vintageleatherjackets.o...-parachute-and-equipment-company-m-422.24872/
L.W. FOSTER SPORTSWEAR CO., INC. CONTRACT
NO.DA-36-243-QM(CTM)2312
Contract date 29th April 1958, delivered in 1958Delivery at peak of nearly 3000 jackets per week.

Subject of a lawsuit between manufacturer and government.

Wide back like earlier Fosters; small collar; rounded pocket flaps; perforated USN stencil in windflap; rounded windflap
[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Foster #4; See L. W. Foster Sportswear Co., Inc. v. the United States. January 24, 1969]
RALPH EDWARDS SPORTSWEAR CONTRACT NO. QM.(CTM)-2313Probable Fiscal Year 1958Company formerly known as “Cagleco”

Small shoulders; collars are large and splay out when worn; pockets are large and placed close to zip; angular windflap; dark liner; high stitch count; mouton frequently a dark shade. Stencil discontinued.
[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Ralph Edwards; Chapman CD> 7823 Cagleco #4]
CALIFORNIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY CONTRACT #QM(CTM)4771-E-601960Narrow shoulders; pockets placed far from zip; narrow back with front panels wrapping back to meet the back panel; angled pocket flaps; perforated USN stencil on windflap[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> California]
BREIER OF AMSTERDAM, INC. QM(CTM)6837-C-601960Teal lining; angled pocket flaps; rounded windflap; broad back[FG 125; Chapman CD> 7823> Breier]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top