A
Anonymous
Guest
Here's a comparison of my GW 27752 and my original 18091. They are both marked 46 but the original is actually a bit larger- the 27752's more like a 45. You can see that the original has a bit more droop than the GW but in both the droop is partially a visual deception caused by the shape of the epaulet with its bit of rise. The 27752 isn't as seal colored as it appears in my bad photos. The original is probably an inch larger in the body and the collar is squished down by years in a trunk or something- the 27752 still has a bit of lift in the collar. So I'll wait for the barrage- I know now how it feels to try and "explain" a jacket with bad photos. As you can see- the original (same as the jacket in Chandler's avatar) has as much or more sheen than the GW. So fire away! Enjoy!
Original:
GW:
Side by side:
OOPS! I couldn't do side by side- sorry!
Both jackets are roomy- the original more so but the 27752's not tight at all. I'll try to do a better review with photos sometime...
Original:
GW:
Side by side:
OOPS! I couldn't do side by side- sorry!
Both jackets are roomy- the original more so but the 27752's not tight at all. I'll try to do a better review with photos sometime...