• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

A comparison of two Perry A-2s

Dr H

Well-Known Member
Perry Sportswear (of Newburgh, New York) produced two A-2 contracts from the fiscal year of 1942. The precise dating of the contracts have been discussed at different times on the forum and although the information is contradictory, it appears from those with better knowledge of the order chronology that the older, smaller goatskin contract (W535ac23377) preceded the later, larger horsehide contract (order number 42-16175-P).

Both contracts retained a collar stand, nipple snaps, and a Conmar zipper. Characteristic of these patterns are the short, rounded collar points and pocket flaps with a shallow curve to the bottom edge and stitch lines that are spaced further from the edge of the flap than is typical. There is open box stitching reinforcement at top corners of the pockets. Although one of my previous 23377s had a three-piece inner wind flap, neither of these sports this feature.

I have finally had the opportunity to examine an example of each contract (in a size 44) alongside each other. Both jackets are essentially original, although the knitted cuffs of the 42-16175-P are older replacements. I have obtained some older, better-matched knits from John Chapman and will be replacing these in the near future. The 23377 lacks a manufacturer’s label and the GW reproduction will be added soon.

The photographs were taken this afternoon outside under overcast skies. Both jackets are notionally russet in colour, but I was most surprised to see the degree of contrast between the two hides: the goatskin is remarkably red in colour (a deep russet) moreover the knits are very red. This is a feature that I have seen before on my previous depot refurbished 23377, and presumably reflects oxidation/degradation of the dye; the 42-16175-P does not show the same colour, being much closer to a mid-brown with a reddish tint.

Both jackets have their original Conmar zips, which are a common feature on Perry Sportswear products, although Crowns were also known (and a previous 23377 that I owned sported a double marked Talon, although this had been through a depot refurbishment). The 42-16175-P was issued at some point in its history to Lieutenant H Cornsweet, whose name is written on the lining along with the date 1943 and also the stamp ‘Wetherby’.

For the record, the statistics of the jackets:

23377
Weight = 1.2 kg (2 lb 10 oz)
Shoulder width = 47.5 cm
Pit-to-pit = 59 cm
Front length = 58 cm
Back length = 67 cm (including collar stand)
Arm length = 56 cm (without knitted cuff)
Epaulettes = 16.5 cm
Collar width = 7.5 cm
Pocket width = 15 cm
Pocket depth = 16 cm
Pocket flap depth = 7.5 cm

42-16175-P
Weight = 1.36 kg (2 lb 15.5 oz)
Shoulder width = 47.5 cm
Pit-to-pit = 59 cm
Front length = 58 cm
Back length = 64 cm (including collar stand)
Arm length = 55 cm (without knitted cuff)
Epaulettes = 17 cm
Collar width = 7 cm
Pocket width = 14 cm
Pocket depth = 16 cm
Pocket flap depth = 7.5 cm

The goatskin jacket is markedly thinner hide and appreciably lighter in weight; it is also longer in the body. The collar does stand significantly higher, being somewhat wider in profile and with snaps placed in different positions compared with the horsehide example.

Finally, the photograph of the rear of the collar shows that most unusual characteristic of the Perry – the offset hanger. The label lines up with the centre of the collar, but all of the four Perrys that I have owned have the hanger offset. Why? I guess we’ll never know…

IMG_8049.jpg


IMG_8050.jpg


IMG_8053.jpg


IMG_8060.jpg


IMG_8051.jpg


IMG_8052.jpg


IMG_8056.jpg


IMG_8048.jpg


IMG_8062.jpg


IMG_8061.jpg
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
Dr H said:
Perry Sportswear (of Newburgh, New York) produced two A-2 contracts from the fiscal year of 1942. The precise dating of the contracts have been discussed at different times on the forum and although the information is contradictory, it appears from those with better knowledge of the order chronology that the older, smaller goatskin contract (W535ac23377) preceded the later, larger horsehide contract (order number 42-16175-P).

Both contracts retained a collar stand, nipple snaps, and a Conmar zipper. Characteristic of these patterns are the short, rounded collar points and pocket flaps with a shallow curve to the bottom edge and stitch lines that are spaced further from the edge of the flap than is typical. There is open box stitching reinforcement at top corners of the pockets. Although one of my previous 23377s had a three-piece inner wind flap, neither of these sports this feature.

I have finally had the opportunity to examine an example of each contract (in a size 44) alongside each other. Both jackets are essentially original, although the knitted cuffs of the 42-16175-P are older replacements. I have obtained some older, better-matched knits from John Chapman and will be replacing these in the near future. The 23377 lacks a manufacturer’s label and the GW reproduction will be added soon.

The photographs were taken this afternoon outside under overcast skies. Both jackets are notionally russet in colour, but I was most surprised to see the degree of contrast between the two hides: the goatskin is remarkably red in colour (a deep russet) moreover the knits are very red. This is a feature that I have seen before on my previous depot refurbished 23377, and presumably reflects oxidation/degradation of the dye; the 42-16175-P does not show the same colour, being much closer to a mid-brown with a reddish tint.

Both jackets have their original Conmar zips, which are a common feature on Perry Sportswear products, although Crowns were also known (and a previous 23377 that I owned sported a double marked Talon, although this had been through a depot refurbishment). The 42-16175-P was issued at some point in its history to Lieutenant H Cornsweet, whose name is written on the lining along with the date 1943 and also the stamp ‘Wetherby’.

For the record, the statistics of the jackets:

23377
Weight = 1.2 kg (2 lb 10 oz)
Shoulder width = 47.5 cm
Pit-to-pit = 59 cm
Front length = 58 cm
Back length = 67 cm (including collar stand)
Arm length = 56 cm (without knitted cuff)
Epaulettes = 16.5 cm
Collar width = 7.5 cm
Pocket width = 15 cm
Pocket depth = 16 cm
Pocket flap depth = 7.5 cm

42-16175-P
Weight = 1.36 kg (2 lb 15.5 oz)
Shoulder width = 47.5 cm
Pit-to-pit = 59 cm
Front length = 58 cm
Back length = 64 cm (including collar stand)
Arm length = 55 cm (without knitted cuff)
Epaulettes = 17 cm
Collar width = 7 cm
Pocket width = 14 cm
Pocket depth = 16 cm
Pocket flap depth = 7.5 cm

The goatskin jacket is markedly thinner hide and appreciably lighter in weight; it is also longer in the body. The collar does stand significantly higher, being somewhat wider in profile and with snaps placed in different positions compared with the horsehide example.

Finally, the photograph of the rear of the collar shows that most unusual characteristic of the Perry – the offset hanger. The label lines up with the centre of the collar, but all of the four Perrys that I have owned have the hanger offset. Why? I guess we’ll never know…

IMG_8049.jpg


IMG_8050.jpg


IMG_8053.jpg


IMG_8060.jpg


IMG_8051.jpg


IMG_8052.jpg


IMG_8056.jpg


IMG_8048.jpg


IMG_8062.jpg


IMG_8061.jpg

IMG_8063.jpg


Sorry...last image!
 

Vcruiser

Well-Known Member
Great comparison. The first thing that stood out to me was the stretch mark like grain on the horsehide Perry. One of the few..or only HH A2 that I've seen with LW type grain that is so prominent on many of their jackets.
 
Thanks for this post...I really appreciate the time you've taken to offer so much information and of course the great photos on these jackets. I especially like posts like this because it enables us to learn a lot about the contracts and clearly see color variances, differences in hides, wearing patterns, etc....

Great post...thanks for sharing!

RA
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
That's kind of you to post RA. I enjoyed picking the two jackets apart in terms of detailing - bit of a Perry anorak as you can see... :oops:
 

Roughwear

Well-Known Member
Therre is nothing wrong with being a Perry fan Ian. I notice your horse hide Perry does not have the three piece back to the windflap.
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
Hi Andrew
Thanks :D
Of the 4 original Perrys that have passed through my hands only 2 (both from 23377 contract) had a three-piece wind flap.
 

Jason

Active Member
Neither of my 16175P Perrys have the three piece back part of the windflap... perhaps its only a characteristic of the goatskin Perrys?
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
Jason, Andrew sent me some images of his latest seal 16175P with a three-piece windflap.
I think that it's more likely an in house method driven by necessity (I.e. making scarce supplies/small hides go further). I'm just surprised that this appears to be the only manufacturer to have used it, unless anybody has seen another?
 

Peter Graham

Well-Known Member
Great comparison test Ian. Two lovely jackets but I've always preferred goatskin A-2's and your photos remind me why. Look at the character in that goatskin and the richer colour compared to the horsehide. Many thanks.
 

Roughwear

Well-Known Member
Dr H said:
Jason, Andrew sent me some images of his latest seal 16175P with a three-piece windflap.
I think that it's more likely an in house method driven by necessity (I.e. making scarce supplies/small hides go further). I'm just surprised that this appears to be the only manufacturer to have used it, unless anybody has seen another?

Seal Perry in a size 46, showing the three piece inner windflap.
006-14.jpg

004-12.jpg
 

Jason

Active Member
Thanks Ian & Andrew, some mouth-watering photos there indeed. Isn't it funny how when a jacket size increases and yet the pocket size stays the same, it appears (to me anyway) to change the whole jackets character? It almost begins to take on a Cable-esque look in your photo Andrew.
 

Roughwear

Well-Known Member
I know what you mean Jason. They were just a quick couple of photos. I'll take some better 3-d ones shortly.
 

Roughwear

Well-Known Member
Dr H said:
Jason, Andrew sent me some images of his latest seal 16175P with a three-piece windflap.
I think that it's more likely an in house method driven by necessity (I.e. making scarce supplies/small hides go further). I'm just surprised that this appears to be the only manufacturer to have used it, unless anybody has seen another?

S. H. Knopf of Boston, who made the no name 42-18246-P A2 had a two piece backing to the windflap on their A2s (not including the normal short leather extension adjacent to the waistband).
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
Thanks Andrew
I felt that it was too sensible a method not to have been used by others.
I see that John incorporates this in his 42-18246-P replica too.
Cheers
Ian
 

saunders

Member
S. H. Knopf of Boston, who made the no name 42-18246-P A2 had a two piece backing to the windflap on their A2s (not including the normal short leather extension adjacent to the waistband).[/quote]

Where did you find such documentation of identification for this no-name A-2, Andrew? Thank you!

Saunders
 
Top