• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Leather 22nd Photo Recon. Patch

Addison

New Member
Only my second try at one of these. All done with enamel paints, and I think it came out pretty good!
 

Attachments

  • patch1.jpg
    patch1.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 290
  • patch2.jpg
    patch2.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 299
  • patch3.png
    patch3.png
    555.1 KB · Views: 316

Flightengineer

Well-Known Member
Not bad, but acrylic paints would allow you to make a drawing more accurately, and after drying, they can not be distinguished from the paints of the WW2 period.
 

Addison

New Member
Thank you so much for the encouragement, both of you. I've always wanted to try my hand at making these...the fascination starts young you know. As for acrylics, I definitely believe you on the superiority over enamel, but I think there's charm in recreating these with the paints that they had back in the day - oil based. No disrespect, just a personal preference.
 

Bombing IP

Well-Known Member
Its a fine line you have to walk when making these patches ,perfection is not the key but a good folkie rendition from an untrained artist to capture the essence of the period . Naive WW2 art is in a class of it own ,proud loud but not perfect . If I may make a suggestion you might want to use indian ink with a pen with a nib to out line and draw in the teeth . Your on the right track and welcome aboard .

BIP
 

Silver Surfer

Well-Known Member
not too shabby, not too shabby at all. doing the patch as you did gives a nice sense of how a wwll patch would have been done on base by a moderately talented airman. stay with the enamel paint for the reasons that you mentioned, as well as the way enamel wears and ages. acrylics will not get the "look" without monkeying around with them.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top