• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Army OG-106 Jacket, Cold Weather (High Temperature) are not (and never were) "CVC/Tanker" jackets

FtrPlt

Active Member
Okay, a bit misleading title but just wanted to add context/background to one very maligned and overlooked flight jacket. Despite conventional wisdom that the Jacket, Cold Weather (High Temperature) is/was a tanker jacket, in reality it both was and wasn't.

Around 1973, Mil-J-43924 came into being as Jacket, Flyer's, Cold Weather -- basically the Army version of the USAF CWU-45/P. It was accompanied by Mil-J-83923, aka Jacket, Flyer's, Lightweight -- the Army version of the CWU-36/P.

Both jackets went through a couple of revisions -- the cold weather jacket receiving updates A thru E and the lightweight jacket receiving updates A thru C. The major changes were as follows:


Both jacket received pattern changes to the pocket closures -- these are likely either the B or C suffix changes.

The Lightweight jacket did not receive any further updates and remained "Jacket, Flyer's, Lightweight" throughout it's production.

Jacket, Flyer's, Cold Weather received a pattern change -- probably the C or D suffix -- in which it received a velcro opening across the upper back, a new nomenclature -- becoming Jacket, Cold Weather, High Temperature Resistant -- and a new NSN. All occurring under the original mil-spec Mil-J-43924.

Both Jacket, Flyer's, Cold Weather and Jacket, Cold Weather (High Temperature Resistant) existed simultaneously until stocks of the former were exhausted. The latter version becoming standard issue for both armor and aviation. TM 10-8400-201-23 is an excellent reference and notes both versions (and their corresponding NSN's) as Standard A (the 'tank' version) and Standard B 'flyer's) as flight jackets, along with the lightweight version. Same TM clearly illustrates the back opening along with other items of clothing that ultimately became dual-use between armor and aviation.

Badging evolved over time. Early-on, the flight jackets had name/branch tapes -- worn the same as on the MA-1. This badging gave way to a flight suit nametag for aviation although it appears armor folks continued with the earlier badging.
 
Last edited:

Spitfireace

Well-Known Member
We like pictures. Here's my 1980 Gibraltar clearly stating on the label it is a Cold Weather (High Temperature Resistant) jacket. So I don't know when they ended the flyers version and started this version.

TM 10-8400-201-23
3-12. REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - Continued
Table 3-6. Jacket, Flyer's
National Stock Numbers
SIZE CHEST HEIGHT COLD WEATHER LIGHTWEIGHT
STD A STD B
X-Small Short Up to 33 in. Up to 67 In. 8415-01-074-9413 8415-00-221-8870 8415-00-217-7201
X-Small Regular Up to 33 in. 67 to 71 in. 8415-01-074-9414 8415-00-221-8873 8415-00-217-7207
X-Small Long Up to 38 in 71 inches up 8415-01-074-9415 8415-00-221-8874 8415-00-217-7208
Small Short 27 to 33 in. Up to 67 in. 8415-01-074-9416 8415-00-221-8879 8415-00-217-7210
Small Regular 33 to 37 in. 67 to 71 in. 8415-01-074-9417 8415-00-221-8884 8415-00-217-7212
Small Long 33 to 37 in. 71 inches up 8415-01-074-9418 8415-00-221-8886 8415-00-217-7213
Medium Short 37 to 41 in. Up to 67 In. 8415-01-074-9419 8415-00-221-8920 8415-00-217-7219
Medium Regular 37 to 41 in 67 to 71 in 8415-01-074-9420 8415-00-217-7387 8415-00-217-7220
Medium Long 37 to 41 in. 71 inches up 8415-01-074-9421 8415-00-217-7391 8415-00-217-7221
Large Short 41 to 45 in. Up to 67 in. 8415-01-074-9427 8415-00-217-7400 8415-00-217-7226
Large Regular 41 to 45 in. 67 to 71 In. 8415-01-074-9422 8415-00-217-7401 8415-00-217-7229
Large Long 41 to 45 in. 71 inches up 8415-01-074-9423 8415-00-217-7402 8415-00-217-7233
X-Large Short 45 inches up Up to 67 In. 8415-01-074-9424 8415-00-217-7422 8415-00-217-7234
X-Large Regular 45 inches up 67 to 71 in. 8415-01-074-9425 8415-00-217-7423 8415-00-217-7235
X-Large Long 45 inches up 71 inches up 8415-01-074-9426 8415-00-217-7424 8415-00-217-7236
20220220_102418_resized_20220220-102436.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20220220_102418_resized_20220220-102436.jpg
    20220220_102418_resized_20220220-102436.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 201

FtrPlt

Active Member
Up until ~1976, both lightweight and cold weather jackets had pockets without flaps. After 1977, both patterns appear to have gained flaps.

Earliest versions I've seen are Gibraltar and Lancer -- both 1980 contracts. I thought I had a photo of a late-1970s label but still looking
 
Last edited:

Spitfireace

Well-Known Member
Yup, I would have guessed late 70's that the Cold Weather (HT) version appeared. I have three of these Gibraltars same year. I bought one and loved it so much I couldn't stop from buying more. Not sure why,
20220108_085526.jpg
because they are 42 years old and will probably still all outlast me. Two of them are used, but I managed to find a NOS one still in the original bag with inspector tags. Not sure if I will ever get around to wearing it. I did notice while looking on E-bay last night that prices seem to have doubled.

So you are saying that we should be calling these OG-106 jackets? Even though it does not say anywhere on labels that is what it is? I have an M-65 jacket that does not say anywhere on the label that it is an M-65 jacket, but an OG-107 jacket. I also have an M-65 that is called a Woodland Camouflage. No mention of M-65 on label. My understanding is that the OG refers to the pattern (Olive Green). It's all pretty confusing. I guess this style of jacket is a Cold Weather (High Temperature). That's a mouthful though so maybe just call it a Tanker.

I just decided to patch one of the used jackets and ordered a 2nd Armored Division shoulder patch on E-Bay last night. I found a cool large embroidered M-1 Abrams patch also, so that might be going on the back at some point.
 

FtrPlt

Active Member
OG-106 is that particular shade of green. It’s the same as the VN-era two-piece flying uniform. Nobody ever called them by that name. They were just flight jackets. Same as nobody says they’re going to be wearing a -36 or -45
 

Ed Rooney

Well-Known Member
The summer jacket was the perfect weight for a cool summer morning on the flight line. I need to get another one. All I have is a sh***y isratex cold weather version.
 

Spitfireace

Well-Known Member
The summer jacket was the perfect weight for a cool summer morning on the flight line. I need to get another one. All I have is a sh***y isratex cold weather version
Found two examples on E-Bay. They seem to be few and far between. I think 1978 was probably around the last of these. CWU-36 is way more prevalent since being introduced in 1972.

1645411827925.png
 

Spitfireace

Well-Known Member
Well, I have no idea what I'm talking about obviously. You lived it. Just seems like there's no rhyme or reason behind what's issued. I was in the RCN so I know what I was issued and what I didn't use etc. I still have white dress pants with white belt and white shoes for tropical deployment sitting in a box in my closet, it was never used. They let me keep it, and for what it's worth I should have said, no I don't want it. Unless I do a John Travolta Saturday Night Fever, it's no good to me. But I digress.
 

FtrPlt

Active Member
Found two examples on E-Bay. They seem to be few and far between. I think 1978 was probably around the last of these. CWU-36 is way more prevalent since being introduced in 1972.

Both the lightweight and cold weather army jackets were used well into the late 1990s and early 2000s. When Army aviation began transitioning to 2-piece flight suits (ABDU) in the late 1990s, a woodland camo version of the M65 field jacket in nomex was the approved flight jacket
 

FtrPlt

Active Member
Pretty sure the OG-106 reference is a carryover from the 2-piece flying uniform these jackets were supposed to go with. Depending upon timeframe and manufacturer, the OG-106 reference may or may not have been present.

Note the "High Temperature Resistance" reference -- coming soon to a Cold Weather Jacket near you

s-l1600 (8).jpg
 

FtrPlt

Active Member
It was a shirt/trousers combo. They're actually softer than CWU-27 nomex. I did my flight training in 1985 and the two-piece had already been replaced by the CWU-27. The two-piece remained authorized into the very late 1980s
 

Attachments

  • Polecat02.jpg
    Polecat02.jpg
    28.4 KB · Views: 245
Last edited:
Top