• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Type A-1 Trousers...Yep, Trousers...1931

zoomer

Well-Known Member
Apologies if someone posted these in the year or so since they sold on eBay - but here is a rarity among rarities, a pair of Switlik Parachute A-1 trousers in sheep-lined horsehide, the companion to the pure-unobtanium B-1 jacket.

I think these were made only by the one contractor, and only in 1931 and 1932, until the blanket lined B-2 jacket and A-2 trou were substituted.

8396589141_07c1bcd805_z.jpg
8397675074_265a36c7ec_z.jpg

8396589197_aea37dc770_z.jpg

8397675150_a6f8991b7e_z.jpg

8396589261_2fd35ee8f6_z.jpg


Notice the Drawing No. 31-2411. The B-2 jacket was Dwg. 31-2412, and perhaps the B-1 was as well - the differences were just the lining and the neck closures.

These went for just $450 on eBay. If they'd been the jacket, what do you bet ten times more in this condition...
 

Dr H

Well-Known Member
That pocket flap is a peach - matches the B-1 really well.
Great colour (both hide and fleece) - none of the modern repros come close to that sadly.
What a bargain.
 

Falcon_52

Active Member
Nice post zoomer. I didn't see those for sale way back when. Something I noticed when looking at Aota's Full Gear book and also these photos is that the A-1/A-2 trouser pockets seem to have a 3-dimensional pocket. What I mean is that the bottom corners look a bit like a B-3 pocket that's been flattened over time - they don't look quite like the pockets on any of the B-2 repro jackets (sewn flat to the body).

Does anyone else see this same thing or am I working too hard?

Noel
 

zoomer

Well-Known Member
The pockets to appear to be slightly bellowsed. I can see that here.

Re the jacket pocket, we know it snagged on chute straps, and all were ordered removed in 1934. The original pocket might have been made flat for just that reason.

The lining is sheepskin. I suspect the spec was changed to moquette for economy reasons - always item one in the air services at that time.
 

zoomer

Well-Known Member
Let's take another look at the 1932 Wright Field test pilots' pic, the best one available of the horsey suits in use.
5211431051_5031791621_o.jpg

Those pockets appear to have been blind-stitched on, which would give that slight bellowsing. None of the B-1 or B-2 repros copy that.
 

zoomer

Well-Known Member
Here's an original (pocketless) Werber B-2 that turned up on The Hat Group a year or 2 back.
You stitch hounds tell me what you think of the holes. I still think blind stitching, one row to secure the edge inside, the next to pull it tight to the body.
No, I don't think it ever had TWO pockets. But maybe the left pocket was moved to the right side.
8403224322_e2fc3ec70b_b.jpg
 

dmar836

Well-Known Member
If I'm following you correctly I don't know how one would stitch the pocket inside out then turn it for the second row of topstitching. About one side is all that would make sense to me. Could it not just be double top-stitched for reinforcement purposes?
The added pocket stitching on the other side has an interesting shape unless a large patch somehow overlapped there at one time. Otherwise looks like there were two variations of pockets there at some point.
Dave
 

zoomer

Well-Known Member
dmar836 said:
If I'm following you correctly I don't know how one would stitch the pocket inside out then turn it for the second row of topstitching.
I don't know myself. My spatial aptitude scores were very low. :lol:

Maybe they did the pockets on a double-needle machine, with the baseplate in between the body panel and the pocket. I know Werber Coat ran double-needles because they advertised for operators in the local papers.
 
Top